Steelmanned

An integrity referee for public debates. We score how each side argued, never who won.

Peter Navarro

1 scored debate

4 challenges faced · 2,138 words scored

76
Debate integrity · one scored debate

Not a career average: Steelmanned has scored Peter once.

Where these scores sit

050100

Peter: 76 (v panel of 6) · shaded to our ±5–8 re-run band · all 46 scored performances shown

Inside our ±8-point re-run band of this record: Dinesh D'Souza's 76, Candace Owens's 76, Jordan Peterson's 76, Gerald Morgan Jr.'s 76. We treat these as indistinguishable from it.

Component standings

Confronted the point68site 52–97
Argued clean100site 6–100
Dealt straight37site 0–87
Let them talk100site 75–100

Peter's strongest component is “Argued clean” at 100. Across the 46 scored performances Steelmanned has published, that component runs 6–100.

A 100 on "Argued clean" means no fallacy points were charged, not that no fallacies were logged. The scorecard lists every logged event, including zero-valued ones.

The record

Piers Morgan UncensoredPanel debate0h 56m

Jim Hanson, Scott Horton, John Kiriakou, Jonathan Conricus, Peter Navarro | Anthony Fauci + Trump Vows Iran Revenge

Peter Navarro
76*
DIS ±8
On a panel with Jonathan Conricus, John Kiriakou, Scott Horton, Jim Hanson & Piers Morgan
CRUX45% · N=4
68
CLEAN30% · 2,138W
100
DEALT15% · N=4
37
TALK10% · 11 TURNS
100

Across 4 challenges (6.8 of 10 weighted) Confronted the trust question with 'two reasons... hydroxychloroquine' and committed that warp-speed development 'did the exact right thing,' conceded Fauci 'had good intentions' while relocating the charge to a possible leak, and did not engage Fauci's PEPFAR/HIV/Ebola record; no fallacies or interruptions recorded.

4 challenges faced · 2,138 words scored · rubric v0.11

Portrait credits